
Case Study: Grand Central Watch
Industry: Watch repair, restoration
Location: New York, NY
Goal: Become the trusted answer when people ask AI assistants for the best watch repair in New York.
Outcome
Grand Central Watch now appears in the number two position in ChatGPT for the query “best watch repair service in New York,” with similar visibility for related prompts such as “best watch repair NYC,” “vintage watch restoration NYC,” and “Rolex repair in New York.” This placement puts the brand in front of high intent customers at the exact moment they ask for a recommendation.
The Challenge
AI answers work differently than classic search. Assistants look for clear entities, authoritative facts, and concise claims that are easy to cite. Grand Central Watch had strong real‑world authority, yet AI systems did not consistently surface that authority in top spots.
What RankedAI Did
AI Answers Audit
We mapped the answer set across ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and Perplexity using 50 buyer‑intent prompts. We recorded citations, competitor mentions, and the phrasing that assistants preferred.Entity and Schema Build
We strengthened the brand entity and added structured data for LocalBusiness and key Services. We connected the website, Google Business Profile, and trusted listings to the same canonical identifiers. This removed ambiguity about who the brand is and what it does.Answer‑Ready Content
We produced concise, citation‑friendly pages that matched common prompts. Examples include “Watch repair in New York,” “Rolex and luxury service policies,” “Vintage restoration,” “Pressure testing,” and “Battery replacement.” Each page led with verifiable facts, pricing clarity where applicable, turnaround expectations, and proof.Proof and Signals
We highlighted years in operation, technician expertise, brand authorizations when relevant, media mentions, awards, and photo evidence of work. We aligned NAP data and review snippets across major local platforms to reinforce consistency.Prompt Coverage and Internal Linking
We clustered queries by intent, then linked supporting pages so assistants could extract short, complete answers without confusion. We used question headers and summaries that mirror how people actually ask.Monitoring and Iteration
Weekly checks tracked placement, citations, and language patterns. We refined page intros, tightened claims, and added missing facts that assistants appeared to favor.
Results We Track
- Placement in AI answers: Number one in ChatGPT for the core query, with strong showings for adjacent prompts.
- Answer share of voice: More frequent citations across comparison and “near me” intents.
- Commercial impact indicators: Higher branded search interest, more qualified inbound calls from people who mention “I saw you recommended,” and stronger conversion rates on service pages.
(AI results fluctuate. We monitor weekly and adjust content so the brand stays prominent.)
Sample Prompts That Now Surface the Brand (ChatGPT links included)
- “Best watch repair service in New York”
- “Best watch repair NYC”
- “Where to repair a Rolex in NYC”
- “Vintage watch restoration New York”
- “Watch repair near Grand Central”
Why It Worked
- Clear entity, consistent facts, and structured data made the brand easy to recognize.
- Short, precise answers matched assistant preferences.
- Real proof reduced uncertainty, which helps assistants choose a single recommendation.
- Continuous monitoring kept the content aligned with fast‑moving AI behavior.
Timeline
First measurable lifts appeared in weeks one to three. Stable top‑of‑page presence for the core query followed after iterative improvements over the next month.
Services Used
AI Answers Audit, Entity and Schema Engineering, Answer‑Ready Content, Local Signal Alignment, Monitoring and Iteration.